Table of Contents
You’re writing SQL code and need the current date and time. Easy, right? But then you hit this wall: should you use GETDATE() or CURRENT_TIMESTAMP? They seem to do the same thing. Are they twins, cousins, or just lookalikes?
Don’t worry. We’re going to break it down nice and easy. By the end of this article, you’ll know which one to use, when to use it, and why it even matters.
Both GETDATE() and CURRENT_TIMESTAMP return the current date and time from the system where your SQL Server is hosted.
They return a value in this format:
YYYY-MM-DD hh:mm:ss.mmm
So for example, you might get:
2024-06-08 14:23:45.123
Looks the same, right? But wait. Let’s dig deeper!
Let’s start with what makes them almost identical:
You might be thinking, “Sounds like I can use either one and move on faster.” You’re kind of right. But hold that thought!
Here’s where it starts to get interesting. While they may look the same on the surface, there’s a key difference under the hood:
What does that mean? Simply put, CURRENT_TIMESTAMP will work in lots of different databases like Oracle, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and more. GETDATE() will only work in SQL Server.
Let’s put them side by side:
Function | Cross-Database? | Returns | Common Use |
---|---|---|---|
GETDATE() | No (SQL Server only) | datetime | Quick timestamping in SQL Server apps |
CURRENT_TIMESTAMP | Yes (ANSI SQL) | datetime | Portable code across databases |
So the first difference is about portability. Want your SQL code to work on more than just SQL Server? Then go for CURRENT_TIMESTAMP.
Let’s compare the syntax too:
SELECT GETDATE();
versus
SELECT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP;
Notice something? GETDATE() has parentheses. CURRENT_TIMESTAMP doesn’t. That’s because CURRENT_TIMESTAMP is not a function—it’s an expression. Small difference, but it can matter if you’re picky about syntax style.
Here’s the truth: performance differences between the two are negligible. They both talk to the system clock and retrieve the date and time instantly. So no need to worry about speed here.
Let’s say you’re inserting a record into a table and you want to store when it was added. Here’s what that looks like:
INSERT INTO Orders (CustomerID, OrderDate) VALUES (123, GETDATE());
Or, using CURRENT_TIMESTAMP:
INSERT INTO Orders (CustomerID, OrderDate) VALUES (123, CURRENT_TIMESTAMP);
Both will do the job. But if you’re planning to switch your database later, better go with the standard one.
Here’s a quick rundown to help you decide:
Hold on, because SQL Server gives you more options!
These are useful if you need more accuracy or deal with time zones often. But for most day-to-day work, GETDATE() and CURRENT_TIMESTAMP are all you need.
Worried about how the date/time looks? SQL Server doesn’t change the display format between the two. But if you need something friendlier, you might format them like this:
SELECT FORMAT(GETDATE(), 'yyyy-MM-dd hh:mm tt');
This gives you something like:
2024-06-08 02:23 PM
Pretty nice, right?
Here’s the bottom line:
Pick the one that suits your needs. If you’re sticking with SQL Server forever and love the function format, go for GETDATE().
But if you dream in database agnosticism, CURRENT_TIMESTAMP is your friend.
No matter which one you use, always check what kind of data type your column expects. Don’t send a datetime value into a varchar field and wonder why things break later!
Now you’re ready to timestamp like a pro. Whether it’s GETDATE() or CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, you’ve got the knowledge to choose wisely.
Happy coding!
In today’s fast-paced digital world, new slang terms and abbreviations are constantly emerging, especially on…
Life360 is a popular location-sharing app that enables families and close friends to stay connected…
In the modern digital landscape, navigating the internet safely has become more crucial than ever.…
RPG Maker VX Ace is a powerful and user-friendly game development tool allowing players to…
Deleting a folder might sound scary—but it’s really not. Especially with the Command Prompt in…
Ever snapped a great photo with your iPhone and thought, “This needs to be a…