Table of Contents
It was a regular Wednesday morning when I received a chilling email from my hosting provider. They had taken my site offline “due to malware detected by an integrated security tool”—MalCare. As someone meticulous about maintenance and security hygiene, this came as a jolt. I hadn’t made any major changes recently, and everything had appeared normal. Little did I know this would spiral into a multi-day ordeal of proving that my site wasn’t compromised—and that an unfortunate false positive from MalCare was to blame.
MalCare mistakenly flagged core WordPress files and recognized plugins as malware in my installation. My host, relying on its automated tool, immediately suspended the site, which disrupted business for days. Through manual review and third-party scanning, I demonstrated the issue was a false positive. After some careful documentation and persuasion, my host reinstated the site and issued a warning to have manual oversight on similar issues going forward.
Imagine logging into your email and seeing the subject line: Your Website Has Been Taken Offline Due to Malware. My heart sank. Opening the email, my host explained they had automatically taken down the site after MalCare flagged suspected malware in several PHP files—including ones I knew were standard WordPress core or custom plugins I had developed myself.
Here’s what happened next:
It quickly became evident that something was off. MalCare had flagged innocuous files—like wp-config-sample.php and files from well-known plugins including Yoast SEO. Even more baffling, a custom plugin I developed with no obfuscation and no external connections had been tagged “critical.”
I dug deeper and noticed that:
After uploading these files to alternative scanners such as VirusTotal, Sucuri, and Quttera, all returned clean results. These tools scanned both the code and its behavior, and none flagged them as problematic.
Hoping to resolve this fast, I contacted my hosting provider’s support. Their initial reply was apologetic but firm:
“We’re unable to reinstate your site unless MalCare shows no malware. We rely on their scoring engine for security flagging. You will need to restore from backup or replace the flagged files.”
This was infuriating—and a bit ironic. I had solid backups, but replacing files unnecessarily, especially when clean, didn’t sit well with me. Worse, they weren’t willing to question the automated tool.
With the host denying responsibility and MalCare providing no appeal channel, I took matters into my own hands:
I created a folder and saved:
For the plugins that were flagged (Yoast SEO, Custom Post Types UI), I contacted the developers. They confirmed that the files hadn’t changed in months and were legitimate. They also expressed concern about MalCare potentially issuing false positives—which I learned, from online forums, was not unprecedented.
I setup a clean installation of WordPress on a subdomain and uploaded original plugin files. Then I ran MalCare again. Surprisingly, identical files were once again tagged!
This helped me prove that the issue wasn’t my installation—but possibly MalCare’s overly aggressive heuristic scan.
I drafted a concise report—less technical, more focused on the business impact. I included:
To my surprise, this got traction. Within 12 hours, I was escalated to Level 2 technical support, where an actual security engineer reviewed the case. After a day of back and forth, they acknowledged the files were misidentified by MalCare and reinstated the site.
This incident, though stressful, was a learning experience. Here’s what I took away:
Security tools like MalCare significantly reduce manual effort, but they’re not immune to false positives. Blind reliance can disrupt businesses based on flawed detection logic.
Because I had stored my own plugin files and knew exactly which versions were installed, I could assert their integrity. Backups let you restore, but file hashes help prove nothing was tampered with.
Persistence paid off. Automated hosting support emails offer limited help, but escalating with a structured case and clear documentation gets results faster.
Relying solely on one scanner can be risky—using multiple tools gave me confidence and objective comparison to build my report.
Post-recovery, I took extra steps to avoid a similar debacle:
This incident reminded me of one of the paradoxes in modern tech: while tools save us time, unverified automation can backfire spectacularly. MalCare remains a powerful solution, but as this experience shows, it’s not perfect. As site owners and developers, we need to hold tools accountable and make sure we have systems in place to distinguish a true infection from a false alarm.
If your site ever gets flagged wrongly, don’t panic—collect your evidence, use multiple tools, and make your case. Rationality and documentation can still break through a wall of automated decisions.
In recent months, users of Leonardo AI’s ControlNet integration have encountered an increasingly common error…
Back in the early days of personal computing, there was one program that ruled the…
When managing a WooCommerce store, automation and data synchronization are critical for seamless operations and…
As artificial intelligence (AI) tools continue to advance, they are increasingly being used to enhance…
For businesses and individuals alike, Microsoft Office remains one of the most essential productivity tools…
In today's streaming age, Epix Play has emerged as a compelling platform for watching blockbuster…